Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:59:59 -0500
From: Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: The truth comes out ... DNA proves evolution is a myth
References: <6c40cc35-7933-4fdb-9f65-8d5db74ac551@googlegroups.com> <nq5au8$i5a$1@dont-email.me> <nq74nf$t2l$1@dont-email.me> <nq76k3$4c3$1@dont-email.me> <d1a35690-3576-4482-afa7-28de7130650c@googlegroups.com> <nqdcm7$4r7$1@dont-email.me> <nqduqa$dee$1@dont-email.me> <nqf4mk$53m$1@dont-email.me> <nqf527$6op$1@dont-email.me> <nqp9iu$h4p$1@dont-email.me> <685df9bc-7806-460a-b89e-19aa57f0badb@googlegroups.com> <nqs3tf$d74$3@dont-email.me> <ceb5eb5b-0936-4f26-b4a3-111223af3b21@googlegroups.com> <nr9goa$aq9$1@dont-email.me> <85ab7f7f-5555-48ec-a339-73e3b4a64ebd@googlegroups.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 19:59:59 +0100
Message-ID: <87eg4mtihc.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNCYR5Z9olMVK9YnbGevgmEWwP8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lines: 34
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-hC7pVlhp3H6SCgZuF/Nzk+TKMTENi0nQ21v2NdrjygANlPWIIOm01nkDMi9Gl2gTSFGQi9cVq6pI6T1!nJUvheybfNd7lhiwiJ+7NjTXTS64SzGEAjiZsgdYd6LLr/cP+A5OQ5i5+RI5rm8L4A==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2949
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:93472

"Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> writes:

> On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 at 2:32:54 PM UTC-4, Ken Brody wrote:
>> On 9/8/2016 12:41 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>> > On Thursday, September 8, 2016 at 12:34:00 PM UTC-4, Ken Brody wrote:
>> >> On 9/7/2016 12:57 PM, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>> >>> Ken Brody wrote:
>> >>>> But the existence of DNA certainly doesn't qualify of evidence
>> >>>> against evolution.
>> >>>
>> >>> Ken, it's not the existence of DNA.  It's the information, organization,
>> >>> required editing, utter complexity, packaging, and dual-use sequences
>> >>> that disprove evolution.  It is not only designed, but designed by the
>> >>> master of masters.
>> >>
>> >> None of those things require a designer.
>> >>
>> >> And, let's assume that someone did "design" the very first creature using
>> >> DNA.  Nothing requires that the DNA must have been designed in its current
>> >> state, and couldn't have evolved into what we see today.
>> >
>> > It does.
>> 
>> So evolution doesn't exist, despite all the overwhelming evidence?
>
> There is no evidence of molecules-to-man evolution.  And if you look
> closely at what is purported at evidence, you'll find that there are
> a great many unanswered questions even within the theory's boundaries.

Well, yes.  That's how science works.

> If you listen to the Ken Ham videos

Ken Ham is as big a fool as you are.