Path: csiph.com!1.us.feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 15:09:39 -0600
From: Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: What if pre-processor was moved to parser?
References: <11c906d6-9be0-44df-82b4-157fdba3b91c@googlegroups.com> <lnwpcqq8v7.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <ab4395b0-213c-4c70-beab-7a19ea1f020e@googlegroups.com> <o8525p$30h$1@dont-email.me> <441a3035-55ea-41e6-a140-2030367ba799@googlegroups.com> <egnq1dFht9oU2@mid.individual.net> <20170217120120.b9bbf85eda05d8bda121396a@gmail.com> <egovvrF7ke0U1@mid.individual.net> <20170217201227.93e1b5cd23e83e7c007cac84@gmail.com> <egpabpF7ke0U2@mid.individual.net> <o87ttq$mh3$1@dont-email.me> <20170218011807.0d1e068b6ecd4344fc3ec5b0@gmail.com> <egpigfF7ke0U7@mid.individual.net> <20170218014557.a7fad1b05918af2c44f6db6d@gmail.com> <egpsncF7ke0U8@mid.individual.net> <o89bb1$8q1$1@dont-email.me> <o89ebo$p0l$1@dont-email.me> <cf5d99a6-4993-4b5f-a3ac-d679d5910dde@googlegroups.com> <o8cg1s$ahb$1@dont-email.me> <327f448d-b32e-48cf-a39e-f95c9550cf5e@googlegroups.com> <o8cu7t$nc$1@dont-email.me>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 21:09:39 +0000
Message-ID: <87efytyjjg.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:p942ajiC9/Q0dj5tsuqR9dPK/lk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lines: 8
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-lmoSSMhgDLWb+a10hZC9//V9qKnCScTpPVLvWpPg2Og4JodS+UuL0kTRghmqZSHHSXoHvAnJDu3m53p!HSmXu8/9orBxjVE0MhESrz0SWaDBUmy0xfJ9ATJD6SOleSzM1Z0wiuMCnItqPaVfhVsKvBI=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2150
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:104231

David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:

> I suppose your justification for these claims is going to be found in
> the usual places, alongside your statistics proving your rule of
> three, rule of two, and so on.

Yes, and if you're interested in retrieving them I can refer you to a
qualified proctologist.