Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: New directions in C Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:14:25 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 26 Message-ID: <87bnjs24ji.fsf@kst-u.example.com> References: <5661d082-b964-4d03-9b19-6d874e69f7f7@googlegroups.com> <16ea447a-b16a-4171-8d1f-252e3ae3ab39@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c77ff4d35e33d1c939d3461ebde8dd0d"; logging-data="12004"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+irN+rwNWtt62NiHUpgv3M" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bkdzHb12KkNEdy0sFsamfUZlPcM= sha1:YKZRnvttRGCn1WPmBzSkzrqw+UM= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:58235 Malcolm McLean writes: [snip] > And of course the extensions to C are, by definition, not > standard. But it's drawing topicality to strictly to say that the > compiler can't be discussed here. If it had achieved market > breakthrough and was a major extension able to support its own > newsgroup, like C sharp, then we'd rule it non-topical. But not for > embryonic extensions, assuming reasonable adherence to community > norms, i.e. not trying to hijack every discussion. comp.compilers.lcc already exists and is reasonably active, though not nearly as active as comp.lang.c. It's primarily focused on lcc, the implementation on which lcc-win was based, but a great deal of the discussion there concerns lcc-win (and it's perfectly topical). [...] I'd say that discussions of proposed changes to the C language are topical either here or in comp.std.c (I might lean towards the latter). -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc. "We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this." -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"