Path: csiph.com!2.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 01:37:04 -0600
From: Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Compiler design in C?
References: <nvsmpq$noi$2@dont-email.me> <nvsn7c$q9o$1@dont-email.me> <nvsnfj$qu8$1@dont-email.me> <nvta5k$48l$1@dont-email.me> <0915fef9-bb57-48b7-b98a-342f0e5ee39f@googlegroups.com> <nvtbjd$ahk$2@dont-email.me> <nvthtd$3pu$2@dont-email.me> <87shr14n5b.fsf@gmail.com> <nvutra$30v$1@dont-email.me> <87r36k1l4w.fsf@gmail.com> <3e47c9bc-1c0a-40dc-9dc3-92e88ace6c31@googlegroups.com> <o00196$hgr$1@dont-email.me> <o004cm$tr5$1@dont-email.me> <o004l1$gj5$1@news.albasani.net> <87lgwrzvqt.fsf@gmail.com> <o016gg$ehm$1@news.albasani.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 07:37:04 +0000
Message-ID: <8737izss4f.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ak6UtaWKVVzEU1XvP0/yRTGyiSc=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lines: 23
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-fDO10O9qC8/T8UuKgoYGc+hO6ptjCaPR56vah2V+KURefPz/bWbqijFm56PsJ2H4m6sxY45BtRs753q!GpA9+hZn4RGLUE7fDOpR7SsFFV83miKa0we4cUtbAHGtS3n1mvAYupZ3gu2BexiB3feM
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2328
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:96267

Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> writes:

> On 2016-11-10, Gareth Owen <gwowen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 2016-11-09, BartC <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> But how the hell do you do it with a std::string instead? You will also 
>>>> find the function name you want to call has been 'decorated'.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, I think there are problems even between different C++ compilers.
>>>>
>>> Lack of standardized C++ ABI is what makes C prefered choice for writing
>>> interfaces for libraries that are callable from any language...
>>
>> This is idiotic. C++ makes it trivial to expose exactly the same library
>> interface as you would in C.
>
> Bullshit. C++ makes a way to expose *C interface* not C++ interface.

I literally don't understand what you're trying to say.

                  "Bullshit.  *repeats what I just said*"