Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: "Microsoft Exploring Rust as the Solution for Safe Software"
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 09:37:05 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <86y2ud28u6.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <qs3qep$qbe$1@dont-email.me> <868sno64x3.fsf@linuxsc.com> <qsfgqv$6c4$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a658bb27d1b88b897660621da5fe7a9e"; logging-data="30932"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/xigY5paTIrAq3tuX6a7Kn3Le1uvKHTks="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nTs65+GsLo5GH5iyH3VMdubH0ig= sha1:crHz7sLjVV7dhhQP954IYTj/3kY=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:148936

Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> writes:

>>> "Microsoft Exploring Rust as the Solution for Safe Software"
>>>     https://www.infoq.com/news/2019/11/microsoft-exploring-rust-safety/
>>> I doubt it.
>>
>> Repeating a similar comment made in another posting, I propose
>> a rule of thumb for postings like this one:  unless a posting is
>> likely to generate a substantial fraction of responses that are
>> simultaneously of interest in both comp.lang.c and comp.lang.c++,
>> it should be multi-posted rather than cross-posted (specifically
>> for c.l.c and c.l.c++).
>
> The article is related to C as well as C++-programmers.
> Multiposting is therefore stupid here.

I think you missed the point of my comment.