Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: One works, the other doesn't?
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 19:50:37 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <86sgmxemia.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <0EgwF.8082$kt1.6599@fx46.iad> <35717f02-8402-418e-acd0-ceec084d15de@googlegroups.com> <4986f18b-f4db-4d07-ae8b-b5ecf71bbe7b@googlegroups.com> <3thwF.58753$VR.56155@fx39.iad> <5gnwF.62102$vc.59910@fx20.am4> <5BIwF.44883$vV6.32008@fx17.am4>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="bd07fdb0e7610947dc98257bdadc7724"; logging-data="13742"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/7/uNOSgk4GBJaEtSP+NhR7x9Ir3i4n98="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JN3VPb2dEMIRF5VtEuF9CzQDf3c= sha1:dCtOkeaYz/mkJOhKjvb38wDJPxg=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:147806
jadill33@gmail.com writes:
> [N]on-negligible projects need some kind of *repeatable* build
> process, independent of the whims of individual developers.
> [...] In my work, developers are not the final builders of the
> end-product, it's configuration management, [...].
>
> When I came on, the old procedures were a badly formatted
> document with a laundry list of manually written commands for
> source control and building an application whose components
> were written in multiple languages using multiple IDEs. [...]
Clearly that situation is pretty awful, but a build environment
that doesn't accommodate multiple development environments is a
sorry excuse for a build environment.