Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: One works, the other doesn't?
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:09:59 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <86mucf8rvs.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <0EgwF.8082$kt1.6599@fx46.iad> <35717f02-8402-418e-acd0-ceec084d15de@googlegroups.com> <4986f18b-f4db-4d07-ae8b-b5ecf71bbe7b@googlegroups.com> <3thwF.58753$VR.56155@fx39.iad> <5gnwF.62102$vc.59910@fx20.am4> <137d8b63-932b-4c86-a210-2cc30a5af630@googlegroups.com> <867e49ej2w.fsf@linuxsc.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="81b92e3fa8397acac1ab5cf195ff75cd"; logging-data="8012"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/EpmOihoPmuzJfHDIhciBUa9Vmni/PtfM="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y9gvlvttqSA1jtnv0Pigl4aQVqI= sha1:sgjM7fiCZG5o/LYRtl66/R1XxPQ=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:148204
Ian Collins writes:
> On 09/11/2019 18:04, Tim Rentsch wrote:
>
>> Ian Collins writes:
>>
>>> On 07/11/2019 07:39, Malcolm McLean wrote:
>>>
>>>> Test-driven development isn't feasible for us.
>>>
>>> What makes it unfeasible for you?
>>
>> Some people just don't like the taste of kool-aid.
>
> I know you find the concept of writing tested code hard to grasp, but
> others find it quite simple.
I understand it just fine. And it's disappointing that you
chose to respond not on the substance of the subject but
instead just to make an ad hominem remark. A surefire way
of telling that someone is selling programming snake oil
is when they start saying things like "you just don't get
it."
Incidentally, TDD != writing tested code. And I understand
that too. But go ahead and make some more ad hominem remarks
if it makes you feel better.