Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: One works, the other doesn't? Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:09:59 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <86mucf8rvs.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <0EgwF.8082$kt1.6599@fx46.iad> <35717f02-8402-418e-acd0-ceec084d15de@googlegroups.com> <4986f18b-f4db-4d07-ae8b-b5ecf71bbe7b@googlegroups.com> <3thwF.58753$VR.56155@fx39.iad> <5gnwF.62102$vc.59910@fx20.am4> <137d8b63-932b-4c86-a210-2cc30a5af630@googlegroups.com> <867e49ej2w.fsf@linuxsc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="81b92e3fa8397acac1ab5cf195ff75cd"; logging-data="8012"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/EpmOihoPmuzJfHDIhciBUa9Vmni/PtfM=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y9gvlvttqSA1jtnv0Pigl4aQVqI= sha1:sgjM7fiCZG5o/LYRtl66/R1XxPQ= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:148204 Ian Collins writes: > On 09/11/2019 18:04, Tim Rentsch wrote: > >> Ian Collins writes: >> >>> On 07/11/2019 07:39, Malcolm McLean wrote: >>> >>>> Test-driven development isn't feasible for us. >>> >>> What makes it unfeasible for you? >> >> Some people just don't like the taste of kool-aid. > > I know you find the concept of writing tested code hard to grasp, but > others find it quite simple. I understand it just fine. And it's disappointing that you chose to respond not on the substance of the subject but instead just to make an ad hominem remark. A surefire way of telling that someone is selling programming snake oil is when they start saying things like "you just don't get it." Incidentally, TDD != writing tested code. And I understand that too. But go ahead and make some more ad hominem remarks if it makes you feel better.