Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Unicode in C Sources
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 06:23:58 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <86ftfafw5d.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <87r1za2hhx.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5afe6ca82d77f883ab9def33834e0994"; logging-data="23407"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/v1iKQbxKOpfy6ism68s6YXq96j/XqQiE="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kwsMAQmgl7s7wfA/EHz9Mt90HN8= sha1:crMrAB/eKQcYVeet89dvrr9g7UI=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:150050
Manfred writes:
> [Assuming glyph confusion is avoided,] I find the possibility of
> some symbol (greek) letters in math code somewhat attractive.
Is it important to have even more one-character identifiers?
Rather than use greek characters just spell them out in regular
letters: alpha, beta, gamma, delta, epsilon, zeta, eta, theta,
iota, kappa, lambda, mu, nu, xi, omikron, pi, rho, sigma, tau,
upsilon, phi, chi, psi, or omega.