Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Unicode in C Sources Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 06:23:58 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 10 Message-ID: <86ftfafw5d.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <87r1za2hhx.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5afe6ca82d77f883ab9def33834e0994"; logging-data="23407"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/v1iKQbxKOpfy6ism68s6YXq96j/XqQiE=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:kwsMAQmgl7s7wfA/EHz9Mt90HN8= sha1:crMrAB/eKQcYVeet89dvrr9g7UI= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:150050 Manfred writes: > [Assuming glyph confusion is avoided,] I find the possibility of > some symbol (greek) letters in math code somewhat attractive. Is it important to have even more one-character identifiers? Rather than use greek characters just spell them out in regular letters: alpha, beta, gamma, delta, epsilon, zeta, eta, theta, iota, kappa, lambda, mu, nu, xi, omikron, pi, rho, sigma, tau, upsilon, phi, chi, psi, or omega.