Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: official library of tiny functions lacking in c Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 07:15:15 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: <86cxttpkwc.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <119ajku$15pve$1@dont-email.me> <119blrr$1ka68$1@dont-email.me> <119busj$1no9s$1@dont-email.me> <119c14p$1ohra$1@dont-email.me> <119ca96$1sr2q$1@dont-email.me> <119d88u$23bo0$2@dont-email.me> <119dgg0$28if0$2@dont-email.me> <119dkku$27s5h$1@dont-email.me> <119dqk0$2cj9m$1@dont-email.me> <119dsk4$27s5h$3@dont-email.me> <119e2f5$2fr80$1@dont-email.me> <119e5ri$2h3ep$1@dont-email.me> <119ef1m$2l27o$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 14:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; logging-data="1275193"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Uqovw6XWO2+Ld7bgVrtFdJdy9564JAQk="; posting-host="18a74afe15b7c222d977d31c18068e17" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:D/c2AlBQIG92IGVS4afHEdwVIrQ= sha1:iVajNoXdUKP08Swt4ka7BS324wI= sha256:slt8hzz6wFGXXl9vTsyseOcZFGw9PO/4L4ZsGsZNMMo= sha1:u2UjnqWBNSLAmZfpZLRifym/79M= sha256:3j6Amkxte7ttjqRU3Hkc0sJsmX4PJpiriqYqfNp1xHo= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:402619 bart writes: > On 28/09/2026 17:49, David Brown wrote: > >> On 28/09/2026 17:52, bart wrote: >> >>> Yes, I know, most languages prefer to have things in libraries >>> rather than in the core. >> >> So perhaps it's a good idea? > > IS it a good idea? Yes.