Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: "Microsoft Exploring Rust as the Solution for Safe Software"
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 22:11:36 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <868sno64x3.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <qs3qep$qbe$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="dc2463479761dea98da7667c87edc47e"; logging-data="15778"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CXB/6l02eTImtcml4sxr71mD7BpmFIec="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PsgIz+bI3cEQHTK53ZICWTw6a5k= sha1:p6X80q/9FnQjPuV0p6oJOHKdbzM=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:148409

Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:

> "Microsoft Exploring Rust as the Solution for Safe Software"
>    https://www.infoq.com/news/2019/11/microsoft-exploring-rust-safety/
>
> I doubt it.

Repeating a similar comment made in another posting, I propose
a rule of thumb for postings like this one:  unless a posting is
likely to generate a substantial fraction of responses that are
simultaneously of interest in both comp.lang.c and comp.lang.c++,
it should be multi-posted rather than cross-posted (specifically
for c.l.c and c.l.c++).