Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: One works, the other doesn't?
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:04:39 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <867e49ej2w.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <0EgwF.8082$kt1.6599@fx46.iad> <35717f02-8402-418e-acd0-ceec084d15de@googlegroups.com> <4986f18b-f4db-4d07-ae8b-b5ecf71bbe7b@googlegroups.com> <3thwF.58753$VR.56155@fx39.iad> <5gnwF.62102$vc.59910@fx20.am4> <137d8b63-932b-4c86-a210-2cc30a5af630@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="bd07fdb0e7610947dc98257bdadc7724"; logging-data="3889"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18YinFhdFlCS5UozspLPdm+V18z1p9HBV4="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OMoVGqqJbQDstDrGAenXeDg5g8Q= sha1:ovgi+iRqXOvqs4/5ZQayprJwZhk=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:147812
Ian Collins writes:
> On 07/11/2019 07:39, Malcolm McLean wrote:
>
>> Test-driven development isn't feasible for us.
>
> What makes it unfeasible for you?
Some people just don't like the taste of kool-aid.