Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: C23 (C2x) changes Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 04:04:32 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 22 Message-ID: <865ytgf5xb.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <86r1cyquwk.fsf@linuxsc.com> <84beca66-cddd-4b7b-a155-444890ea8fd9n@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b7f56eff5ad6c7d9130605d054ce58ef"; logging-data="21911"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19JiTFDftRIlQj8hZYDOpUw00t38zWy3Po=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LeYrHlvVSmdRC5xGTULPYGWfj+M= sha1:sf8rr2MsF0vg2dYhZ2Go3ZhVdO4= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:163232 Thiago Adams writes: > On Wednesday, October 6, 2021 at 8:01:38 AM UTC-3, Tim Rentsch wrote: > >> Mehdi Amini writes: >> >>> It seems these are some of changes for C23(C2x) standard taken from >>> draft documents: >>> >>> https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/23 >>> https://thephd.dev/c-the-improvements-june-september-virtual-c-meeting >>> >>> What do you think of changes ? >> >> My impression is that as time goes on C is looking more and more like >> C++ and less and less like C. That's a bad trend. > > I don't think C is going that way. At least for now.. > Do you have any proposal in mind to justify this? [...] Forgive me for being blunt, but I find your postings idiotic. I don't see any value in participating in that idiocy.