Path: csiph.com!xmission!nnrp.xmission!.POSTED.shell.xmission.com!not-for-mail
From: nobody@example.org (Scott)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Abstract Syntax Tree for C programs
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 15:43:29 GMT
Organization: XMission http://xmission.com/
Message-ID: <5cf68efd.2442318205@core>
References: <9cbcea67-85a8-4de3-ac01-04922ba5fc74@googlegroups.com> <HBZGE.398991$iy4.303434@fx06.am4> <lnblzntma9.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <Hw8HE.541380$II6.345396@fx07.am4> <qcj9n9$7iu$1@dont-email.me> <rlaHE.491469$6s.287699@fx39.am4> <a49301ee-56c1-4359-a97c-bcac1c9ffeab@googlegroups.com> <HSaHE.494938$6s.422110@fx39.am4> <d18e9aaf-ba4f-4b35-81cc-48782d121948@googlegroups.com> <HLfHE.1571400$XN1.651280@fx23.am4> <7cff3be5-0432-4a90-92ed-50c74cc1eb6b@googlegroups.com> <CawHE.1573385$XN1.171804@fx23.am4> <2220fa9d-4fea-4ea6-bb32-6843143322fb@googlegroups.com> <SnOHE.532867$X23.202105@fx38.am4> <475067fe-369c-4246-84a1-05b1a3a0c6be@googlegroups.com> <dtRHE.433290$jo3.201774@fx10.am4> <c6328115-1268-46a7-bc5f-c3b559deb0fd@googlegroups.com> <T8VHE.599012$II6.514448@fx07.am4> <5dd4672f-a571-40bc-bb1a-c14f6c631eb7@googlegroups.com> <OR_HE.612559$Qy4.198146@fx04.am4> <ccfd7e39-8e00-449e-b8db-30c48f1a714b@googlegroups.com> <FcbJE.644503$Qy4.643379@fx04.am4>
Injection-Info: news.xmission.com; posting-host="shell.xmission.com:2607:fa18:0:beef::4"; logging-data="32321"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xmission.com"
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:144407

On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 16:41:24 +0100, Bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote:

>All I want to do here is take PROG (the parameter represented by %1) and 
>compile PROG.c into PROG.exe. Nothing more. (For this test, the best 
>optimisation is applied in each case.)

You never heard of 'make'?

The problem you deliberately ignore is that if you have a single
canned solution that's right for someone, it will inevitably be wrong
for someone else. That's why we have a big box full of tools with ways
to customize how they work.

I recognize what you're doing, I've done it myself in my ignorant
youth. If it goes well it's educational. I say feel free to continue
re-inventing the wheel, but I would thank you to stop shitting in this
newsgroup with your like-C-but-not-C art project.