Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:25:48 -0500 Message-ID: <504EA12F.43AF@mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:25:51 -0400 From: pete Reply-To: pfiland@mindspring.com Organization: PF X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Wrapping existing UNIX commands in C References: <02eb160b-1884-4c72-b3ef-8febdfcd5830@c25g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <1c8af2ab-f41e-4e66-a410-9de74bda2408@h5g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> <91ba9058-2677-4e0f-8727-d63b1f3fa79d@n13g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <90326476-cbc2-49ea-b55e-9cd794727529@m13g2000vbd.googlegroups.com> <50201EAE.1010800@verizon.net> <504d60f9$0$23778$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <20120910113301.106@kylheku.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 33 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 4.154.217.243 X-Trace: sv3-NjoG9M8l7Elc6H0ujGrAiTST2yxWsIy7MuzzBM4vI0p4Zk3LaYWREvMTc4lkIf5QXGu1mMQpluI3F9P!Qeqfdr7FSTw0fZrffBuUfdyNxDiRjMNUw65Hm8gfA0vK3UXlzaz5pNUXSdPsg851ulrSiOMxfHRW!6X8QAWkNR6Y= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2893 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:26211 Kaz Kylheku wrote: > > On 2012-09-10, Keith Thompson wrote: > > Robert Miles writes: > > [...] > >> Where is it sensible to post the first message of your thread if it > >> is mainly a question about what the proper forum is, > >> since you haven't > >> been able to find any forum that looks suitable? > > > > By convention, discussions about topicality are considered topical. > > You didn't think this one through, Kiki. > > "Where might it be topical > to ask a question about hair spray for rats?" > > What if that topicality being discussed > has nothing even remotely to do with > the topicality of the newsgroup? > > This new-fangled "topicality is topical" is not a convention, > but only an excuse for some regulars > to feel they have "immunity" when engaging in extended > debates about why something or someone is off topic. > This view is overdue for being laid to rest. You're off topic. Oops! -- pete