Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: code snippet
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:15:14 -0500
Organization: Byte Craft Limited
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <4F036FE2.6B947764@bytecraft.com>
References: <4eee988e$0$16043$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net> <358te7hacn7hb74jdse2phqusbsia2loj6@4ax.com> <4eeea69e$0$13642$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net> <jcnau9$lld$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4eefad9d$0$15691$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net> <jcokbo$sji$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4eefdaed$0$16533$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net> <jconhp$36f$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4ef0f53d$0$19133$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net> <jcspf0$8md$1@speranza.aioe.org> <8589915.363.1324479784976.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prht13> <0.4b8c1cc5fedd08ec9708.20111221214133GMT.87r4zxmwky.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <28271069.79.1324514157943.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prdv33> <0.f11c74e6cc5bf465d9c4.20111222031918GMT.87hb0tmgy1.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <9453445.440.1324566701765.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prez5> <slrnjf6ocv.1rti.usenet-nospam@guild.seebs.net> <jcvrjq$feg$1@dont-email.me> <4F035609.2E6947C8@bytecraft.com> <20120103113739.535@kylheku.com>
Reply-To: walter@bytecraft.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: w1bQDqNS7PbJ0vaYnwnjhQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD479  (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c:15386



Kaz Kylheku wrote:

> > Very few as in some C compilers actually check that everything that can be
> > done in asm can be done in C.
>
> Really? An example or two would go a long way here.

http://bytecraft.com/C_versus_Assembly

w..