Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Taming The Switch-Statement Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 22:55:42 -0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Message-ID: <11bbfte$dul$1@reader2.panix.com> References: <119qf6l$2rmg3$1@dont-email.me> <11bb47i$889c$1@dont-email.me> <11bb7nk$noa$1@reader2.panix.com> <11bbd8k$bhfq$1@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 22:55:42 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80"; logging-data="14293"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:403437 In article <11bbd8k$bhfq$1@dont-email.me>, bart wrote: >On 21/10/2026 21:36, Dan Cross wrote: >> In article <11bb47i$889c$1@dont-email.me>, bart wrote: >>> On 21/10/2026 19:38, Dan Cross wrote: >>>> In article <11baur1$63id$1@dont-email.me>, bart wrote: >>> >>>>> So, now tell me what I've got wrong. >>>> >>>> Wow. You really, truly, have no idea how any of this works. I >>>> don't even know where to begin. You just throw around words but >>>> have no idea what they mean in context. >>>> >>>> It's breathtaking, really. >>> >>> And Wow, your reply is exactly the kind I expected! >>> >>> Of course, you're not going to tell me what API means versus ABI, and >>> you're not going to answer my question about what I've got wrong. >> >> Honestly? No, I'm not. It's clear that if I tried, you would >> either not understand, or deliberately ignore it so you could >> blindly continue in your self-imposed ignorance. >> >>> Because actually you don't know. >> >> Umm..... >> >>> This was apparent from things you've said in the past. >> >> You know, it's one thing to be ignorant yourself. It's quite >> another to project that onto others. > >I've seen zero evidence that you know anything about the matter. Just >bluster. And sadly, I've seen plenty of evidence confirming that you know nothing about it at all. - Dan C.