Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.ai.philosophy,comp.lang.prolog,comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: Provably unprovable eliminates incompleteness [ All infinite sets have the same cardinality ] Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2019 11:10:01 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8286bf823aa591a4447bcf77f162785a"; logging-data="25994"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+B8B45FLs6AHTPXVGgdNet" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:tK1pt/yKB/StT/f0AUvLvi5dQ2k= sha1:xM+OFjI6f3Vk0On8RbjcabK9DLs= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:68478 comp.ai.philosophy:19254 comp.lang.prolog:9681 comp.lang.lisp:33334 peteolcott writes: > On 9/17/2019 3:05 AM, Juha Nieminen wrote: >> In comp.lang.c++ peteolcott wrote: >>> The length of this interval is exactly 3.0 >>> (0.0, 3.0] >>> The smallest real number larger than 0.0 is its first point. >> >> You can repeat that as many times as you want, but that will not make >> such a number to exist. >> >> There is no "smallest real number larger than 0". [...] Agreed. > Keith Thompson proves that he fully understands the Infinitesimal > number system: I do not fully understand infinitesimals, and I have not claimed that I do. [...] -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org Will write code for food. void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */