Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Ian Collins Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: "Microsoft Exploring Rust as the Solution for Safe Software" Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 15:09:32 +1300 Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <17b505d3-0e93-4f75-8b7e-7bafb22f6d1c@googlegroups.com> <_kwHF.268125$Ko9.255561@fx48.iad> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Umeeuw95KlyNUdgbqRgeOwJnru7cJkm3m0/efZoP/OT6Masmjq Cancel-Lock: sha1:bcRQ6/SCJSToPJIlVfyNfCgvaLk= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:70368 On 10/12/2019 10:50, Ned Latham wrote: > Scott Lurndal wrote: >> Ned Latham writes: >>> Scott Lurndal wrote: >>>> >>>> NT3.51 and NT4.0 (Win2k) both contained portions of Windows 3.1 in the >>>> so-called 'Windows on Windows' subsystem. >>> >>> IOW, a partial emulator? >> >> WoW used the intel vm86 mode to execute pure win3.1 code. > > Amazing. I cannot fathom why anyone would want backwards compatibility > with such a dud. Games. -- Ian.