Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Spiros Bousbouras Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,news.admin.net-abuse.usenet Subject: Re: Server glitch vs other possibilities (Was : Compute Unique Numbers in a Set) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 17:47:46 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 52 Message-ID: References: <36403165-3cf1-4b73-8ad1-da339b960339n@googlegroups.com> <7f79edd3-1735-4d01-9760-bd24db578e41n@googlegroups.com> <02q63458-1orq-4135-9358-994371poq6o8@zvaqfcevat.pbz> <730105qr-2qrs-oo6q-30r7-p3o6r8p793p4@zvaqfcevat.pbz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 17:47:46 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="4da7283de226f90f5ae6321c2489f228"; logging-data="264498"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18z2FCAXf4F2C1xIyZ7uVpc" Cancel-Lock: sha1:6PrscHb4gbui/aRbAu7M1hEDMd0= X-Organisation: Weyland-Yutani X-Server-Commands: nowebcancel In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:88809 news.admin.net-abuse.usenet:12045 On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 14:20:19 +0100 David Brown wrote: > It is quite clear that there has been a glitch on the > news.eternal-september.org server. Somehow, a message body from > rec.arts.books has been crosslinked, was delivered as though it matched > the normal-looking pre-downloaded header in the thread. (I'm guessing > Muttley actually made a post in the original thread, but I am unable to > see the real message body.) The glitch appears to be limited to > news.eternal-september.org - other users of that server have said they > saw it, while it did not appear on other servers. People have reported > the existence of the rambling essay post in rec.arts.books, made by Ilya > Shambat - it was a real post, but on news.eternal-september.org the > message body was accidentally attached to the wrong header summaries for > comp.lang.c++. > > Usenet server glitches are rare - client glitches are more likely. The > same glitch occurring for at least three different people is, however, > highly unlikely. It could be a Thunderbird issue. Note the following : From: Bonita Montero Newsgroups: rec.arts.books,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: Compute Unique Numbers in a Set Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:42:54 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 From: red floyd Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: Compute Unique Numbers in a Set Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:42:51 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 From: David Brown Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,news.admin.net-abuse.usenet Subject: Re: Server glitch vs other possibilities (Was : Compute Unique Numbers in a Set) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 18:30:21 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 All 3 of you use Thunderbird. Not precisely the same version but close. I assume you have tried to reproduce the steps which originally led you to see the defective post and you can no longer reproduce them. -- vlaho.ninja/prog