Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: a kind of template (or macro) to reuse parts of code...
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:53:59 +1300
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <9frlr7FvblU2@mid.individual.net>
References: <j7a2dr$reb$1@gregory.bnet.hr> <j7a4rj$g9k$1@dont-email.me> <j7a5ce$13h$1@gregory.bnet.hr> <9frk0iFvblU1@mid.individual.net> <j7a6ip$3cr$1@gregory.bnet.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 4y5fpa0oN5fWEfsZuW9aSQyrTNIHe4NawTQZJAbm88PU6plQ7g
Cancel-Lock: sha1:986FCMC7V+4Rx/0gi0WiG0KlkIU=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20101021 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4
In-Reply-To: <j7a6ip$3cr$1@gregory.bnet.hr>
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:10851

On 10/15/11 09:36 AM, A wrote:

*Please don't snip attributions, it is rude.*  I'll ignore you if you do 
it again.

 > Ian wrote:

>> C++ (and C these days) compilers are very good at inlining trivial
>> functions.
>
> OK, it is not just the speed, it is also the convenience and maintaining the
> code.

How is a macro list thing more convenient than a function?

> Anyway, back to topic, is something like what I asked possible in a way to
> do with macros or templates or any other way except functions?

Why?  You haven't provided any justification for this new construct.

-- 
Ian Collins