Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: pthread memory leaks
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 12:02:46 +1200
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <94iph6Fr2iU12@mid.individual.net>
References: <9430fe32-d385-49a3-b925-daf3cd421789@j13g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <94ioqnFr2iU10@mid.individual.net> <078e7033-8005-41c3-a075-d77815d10cdd@e17g2000prj.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net XtajENNWcnVVtIN8ogBXIgl4wwybIvfkMJE8uvTKrCJnMr25g1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ft6+YjMO3qHA7HI4ks/8nl6/0Rg=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20101021 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4
In-Reply-To: <078e7033-8005-41c3-a075-d77815d10cdd@e17g2000prj.googlegroups.com>
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:5854

On 05/31/11 12:00 PM, jakash3 wrote:
> On May 30, 4:50 pm, Ian Collins<ian-n...@hotmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>> Note this is an in use block, not an actual leak.  Probably an internal
>> I/O buffer.
>
> Thank you for responding.
> You're right, I didn't look at the output close enough. It reported
> 144 bytes possibly, not definitely, lost.
> This is good, because I'm making a posix/win32 class for
> multithreading.

Have you looked at boost thread?

-- 
Ian Collins