Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Ian Collins Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: delete[] p or delete[] *p Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:44:12 +1200 Lines: 17 Message-ID: <90pblsFeeiU20@mid.individual.net> References: <04718043-b351-42da-9deb-5aa1c652bcec@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <9pGop.51037$7u3.18362@newsfe04.ams2> <69e5ab7b-822c-4223-b905-74253d16e925@j17g2000vbr.googlegroups.com> <5c2c27e8-e02d-4818-9be0-7afb3a1796a9@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <34Cpp.5463$Y71.4950@newsfe17.ams2> <149c55b8-2efb-4c39-913e-e6d204cb9676@o21g2000prh.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net EfpDO0BEwtFNEsanw0Eb+QpHTGzeWRR6NHeEh2DZWYtdV/bx9f Cancel-Lock: sha1:NbIIFAXqBuQPhekkqgrnS7A6BnM= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20101021 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 In-Reply-To: Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:3729 On 04/15/11 10:04 AM, Paul wrote: > > Your understanding is flawed, the C++ standard defines a pointer to a 2d > array to be of this type/ level of indirection. > > No. According to the C++ standards, a pointer to an array is a different > level of indirection, but in the opposite direction from what you are > saying. Come on, get it right. Is there one standard that defines the C++ language or more than one? Which sections on the mythical other language (not library extension) standard are you referring to? Citations, please. -- Ian Collins