Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Is it possible to test if a raw pointer is pointing to a valid object?
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 11:59:49 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <87zgftwjq2.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <te5lf8$3camt$1@dont-email.me> <te5mrp$3ceup$1@dont-email.me> <874jy1y1ss.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <te5oet$3cjid$1@dont-email.me> <te5oh4$3cjid$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ba7b50a2a22d5fe194a1cea15d08e5dc"; logging-data="3571384"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/PPmvqERtD+txbOlUTrfbc"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qnE0i/sVREbLGzZfTxIBsCvx6iY= sha1:n0WT6iNsn21xwCRBuOHr0neuzxs=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:86041

JiiPee <kerrttuPoistaTama11@gmail.com> writes:
> On 24/08/2022 20:51, JiiPee wrote:
>> On 24/08/2022 20:44, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>>> void main()
>>> Of course main returns int, not void.  (I know that was in the parent
>>> article.)
>> but its shorter to type, hehe
>
> actually compiles in visual studio

Most C++ compilers aren't fully conforming by default.  Any conforming
C++ implementation must diagnose `void main()` (and may then either
accept it or reject it).

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Philips
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */