Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: "C Is The Greenest Programming Language" by: Chris Lott Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:40:54 +0200 Organization: Games and Theory Lines: 27 Message-ID: <87mtlt99i1.fsf@tigger.extechop.net> References: <87ilwjoykx.fsf@tigger.extechop.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="bb4a0acc57b43bf73be7db1a17a9b6c0"; logging-data="11718"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/DZFTQoiCMlNEpQkru88Xz" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:XQaQlC6Ig3EW7kjzBTD0aUJgqyQ= sha1:HtJQOdXzGn282zCnDhJgdg+rLU0= X-Face: 'g'S,X"!c;\pfvl4ljdcm?cDdk<-Z;`x5;YJPI-cs~D%;_<\V3!3GCims?a*;~u$ On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 14:17:50 +0200 > om@iki.fi (Otto J. Makela) wrote: >>Lynn McGuire wrote: >> >>> "C Is The Greenest Programming Language" by: Chris Lott >>> https://hackaday.com/2021/11/18/c-is-the-greenest-programming-language/ >> >>Perhaps one contributing factor is that not so much development is any >>longer done using C or C++, and the programs that are run (and still >>being developed) were originally created in the era when CPU power was >>much lower than these days, so code optimization was more important. > > Its good to see the attitude of just throw more CPU at something > instead of optimising it is still around. These days when server > farms are taking up a siginificant percentage of the planet's > electrical output its beholder on programmers to make their code > as efficient as is reasonable. I keep rereading that first sentence, is the meaning reversed? -- /* * * Otto J. Makela * * * * * * * * * */ /* Phone: +358 40 765 5772, ICBM: N 60 10' E 24 55' */ /* Mail: Mechelininkatu 26 B 27, FI-00100 Helsinki */ /* * * Computers Rule 01001111 01001011 * * * * * * */