Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: rational numbers
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 14:13:39 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <87fstwmhz0.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <shvf4c$ark$3@gioia.aioe.org> <si19hm$3cl$1@gioia.aioe.org> <qe11J.71442$QzOf.28358@fx17.iad> <iqkfv1Fb6apU3@mid.individual.net> <si4db4$9oc$1@dont-email.me> <J4n1J.42459$3p3.40193@fx16.iad> <si54jt$5ql$1@dont-email.me> <si7327$103b$1@gioia.aioe.org> <si75fo$q7k$1@dont-email.me> <si7msk$1vdt$1@gioia.aioe.org> <gkO1J.90181$rl3.18099@fx45.iad> <si8h8v$pt0$1@dont-email.me> <si9a0a$vgn$1@dont-email.me> <sia8ap$qft$1@dont-email.me> <siedkq$1n0a$1@gioia.aioe.org> <sieub2$trn$1@dont-email.me> <sif218$gmj$1@gioia.aioe.org> <sif2b8$oto$1@dont-email.me> <sif6u8$ogi$1@dont-email.me> <sifdsq$bf5$1@dont-email.me> <sifh9s$1hh$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b5fd9637bf49c8f43a3bd672d60f3caf"; logging-data="1329"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18c3sASwVIrv8Xd955zrir0"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZNDzlCWoME4j1oBSD43hd9eq/uM= sha1:lR6HHj2IOqitAPObRMs42l0NpaQ=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:81430

HorseyWorsey@the_stables.com writes:
[...]
> But then someone who writes "auto main() -> int" instead of "int main()"
> and then forgets the return value at the end anyway is probably not someone
> who writes sensible code.

Were you not aware that reaching the closing "}" of main() does an
implicit "return 0;"?

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Philips
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */