Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: two's complement idea Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 07:56:46 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <86y2sqace9.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="736228d0aa4bff80edfe6f310ec1eb3b"; logging-data="26676"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19IUGLSuQrKTcIaQ95CyM2TgX0e8TlvcIU=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:1MvFomT1DFyzIjfhfC4TBtStjjc= sha1:t2niH8haM3mLVQUobU4BM+iyV7M= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:72021 cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) writes: > In article , > Alf P. Steinbach wrote: > >> On 22.01.2020 08:32, Bonita Montero wrote: >> >>> I recently had the problem that I wanted to have a constant which is >>> size_t wide and where the highest bit is set. I simply solved it that >>> way (I assume ptrdiff_t as wide as size_t, but this should be common >>> today on all platforms): >>> std::size_t const SIZE_T_MSB = std::numeric_limits::min(); >>> A guarantee from the standard that signed values are 2's-complement >>> woud be nice for that. >> >> C++20 will give you that guarantee. >> >> But e.g. `size_t(-1) - size_t(-1)/2` does the job with just C++98 >> guarantees. > > Hmm, can't one simply compute: > > ~(size_t)0 ^ (~(size_t)0 >> 1) > > ? Why not just this? (size_t)-1 /2 +1