Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Examples of current platforms/architectures where sizeof(void*) > sizeof(int*) ?
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 13:01:58 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <86ily9rkg9.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <sgglb9$c02$1@dont-email.me> <3a825e94-940c-49c5-990a-554a6bcc35a4n@googlegroups.com> <sglkrv$6g7$1@dont-email.me> <_XsXI.31292$o45.12466@fx46.iad> <sglneb$phc$1@dont-email.me> <sgm3uf$ca3$3@dont-email.me> <ATMXI.17685$F26.3573@fx44.iad> <sgoagm$65f$2@redfloyd.dont-email.me> <sgoc7u$klk$1@dont-email.me> <QgPXI.17692$F26.495@fx44.iad> <sgogmu$rpo$1@gioia.aioe.org> <t7QXI.8719$6U3.1972@fx43.iad> <sgokn7$hru$1@dont-email.me> <sgpsmq$1kl4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <sgq5qr$vmk$1@dont-email.me> <sgsaue$miv$1@gioia.aioe.org> <86tuixvq16.fsf@linuxsc.com> <7567b0bb-07ba-4436-9716-aaf3ed62b306n@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="f63a7b6827eb8960d7c84af554cfeab9"; logging-data="917"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+EulkGsKNqUJ4Azb0BmoFe2/e/qNKDC20="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pFsK1P8zQjIZKPnQipVRfWtOgCs= sha1:oy2jrjIWj3i4IHmlJ1s0Y9F4SOA=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:81880

"daniel...@gmail.com" <danielaparker@gmail.com> writes:

> On Monday, September 6, 2021 at 8:37:26 AM UTC-4, Tim Rentsch wrote:
>
>> Juha Nieminen <nos...@thanks.invalid> writes:
>>
>>> What' I'm saying is that it's utterly *stupid* to spend so much time
>>> and effort to create a library with the intent of being the absolute
>>> best at what it's doing, intended for a very wide audience and
>>> serious applications... and then limit its use to one particular
>>> platform while completely ignoring one of the most popular
>>> platforms.
>>
>> You forgot to say "IMHO".
>
> Redundant, surely.  Whose opinion could it be, if not Juha 's?

One of the reasons for including "IMO" or "IMHO" is to show that
the speaker understands and appreciates the differences between
fact, belief, and opinion.

Also consider the puzzle related to the very logical island
people who deliberately avoid learning their own eye color.