Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: To C or not to C++ Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:44:29 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 17 Message-ID: <86bksluqpu.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <2868500762@darkrealms.ca> <19c3945f-f9ef-44a1-a0f1-b80c39485fe3n@googlegroups.com> <87h72he0nb.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <9f308371-ba3c-45f5-8aa7-115fcba460fbn@googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="9f5fdd80571645ef69adbce5a0ea0f3b"; logging-data="4009956"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ySilzpFfrBZeVo6gf2v+EZ0Mv3wLixlI=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BA3qgz9NZQ47IsbFXEMg/NSof98= sha1:9HzdQHDSLc9x0xgPogmtmVX19vE= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:85951 Manfred writes: > [...] if you are programming in the common subset of C > and C++, then you are effectively programming in C, aren't you? In my experience programming in the common subset of C and C++ is much more like programming in an annoyingly braindamaged subset of C than it is like programming in C. > I mean, practically: with respect to C, you are excluding at most 5% > of the language; [...] Unfortunately excluding 5% of the language ends up excluding 95+% of the programs (and probably more for programs of any reasonable size). I think no C programmer naturally writes C programs that fall into the common subset of C and C++, except by accident, and that happens only rarely, and in small programs.