Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: How can I get the type in a C++17 fold function? Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 19:58:35 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: <868riptudw.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <86bknnujmm.fsf@linuxsc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5315b21d6b06d8eb540e6a56a23f5914"; logging-data="617003"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18o2Dw/hj5f8q5QW4TrymKRAqOqLff1gJE=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:vJIH+UaDUyghJgiDeOZX29NO0w0= sha1:D9C3sGBmBmUVSHPtDP+mtqv9Hik= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:88302 Paavo Helde writes: > 29.12.2022 02:41 Tim Rentsch kirjutas: > >> scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: >> >>> "While complexity seeks order through addition, simplicity >>> seeks it through subtraction. Most people have a built-in bias >>> toward addition instead of subtraction. For some reason, the >>> concept of more comes naturally to us." >> >> It appears the original source of this quote is here: >> >> https://uxdesign.cc/the-quest-for-simplicity-5c31ae2c553f >> >> I encourage people to read the article. Not that I think what it >> says is deep or profound, I don't, but I think people might be >> interested to read it. > > I guess that's how we arrive to "simple" user interfaces like unclear > amount of white borderless text boxes on white background, some of > which are maybe editable and some of which are maybe empty. > > And then there are these phone apps which require unknown amount of > hand gestures of unknown types, in unknown place, for interaction. But > the interface looks simple. Yes, this is very much like my own reaction.