Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Wikipedia
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 08:28:05 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <861qw0ze62.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <20220530195216.0000551a@reddwarf.jmc.corp> <20220531180032.000018e7@reddwarf.jmc.corp> <20220531184340.000065fe@reddwarf.jmc.corp> <94a89312-3fde-49f5-81a7-f63b007635f5n@googlegroups.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8d3b78834a5fcc019414bbade7c1b111"; logging-data="27823"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++A5uEeYmIRhJyj0PjKw7OgZeXmT3/Tao="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:h67/uQBljmnq+x6dxnski0UItIo= sha1:L1/gRO6klicwU8MZHglcjwmXI4c=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c++:84574
Manfred writes:
> On 6/1/2022 6:12 PM, daniel...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
>> I've given the reasons for my conclusion in my posts, I think it's
>> the only tenable conclusion, I think that, much like some readers
>> of religious texts, you and David are reading into the Guidelines
>> what you want to read. But the discussion is about what the
>> Guidelines say, not about what's right.
>
> Sorry, nothing religious about my reading of SF.6, which you snipped.
He didn't say there was, or even suggest it. If you think
otherwise you should go back and re-read his statement more
carefully.