Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: ittium <ittium@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Non-deterministic behavior of multithreaded software
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 10:09:34 +0530
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <4E40BA06.1060303@gmail.com>
References: <18caa0ec-2225-42a5-87cf-ffecc346b8c3@a2g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <slrnj3prsd.gtj.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="Jr+GCtWa+XbvmSdRpa1MLQ"; logging-data="6394"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18CTrbFixX4XyIwu65V3GqV"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
In-Reply-To: <slrnj3prsd.gtj.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:U4dlmSZDG5+sUtrdBEeG3eYn4uE=
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.c++:8572

On 06-08-2011 PM 01:08, Jorgen Grahn wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-05, itt ium wrote:
> ....
>> 2. Is it a bad idea to have multiple threads for the same fd.
>
> For doing the actual *reading*, or for processing the data once read?
>
>> If yes
>> than how to increase capacity of a software that receives large amount
>> of data on a single fd only.
>
> Impossible to say anything without knowing the specifics. We know (or
> can guess) you do some kind of IPC, but that's all.  There is no
> single best design for all kinds of servers.
>
> And, it's completely offtopic here.

My apologies, this was posted by mistake. You can ignore it.