Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail
From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.c++,alt.comp.lang.rust,alt.folklore.computers
Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9CThe?= end of software secrecy is almost upon
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2026 13:34:58 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <11bl0i2$8cd$1@reader2.panix.com>
References: <11amvre$15far$1@dont-email.me> <20261025011151.000038ef@yahoo.com> <11bjif3$7p0$1@reader2.panix.com> <11bkfcc$104cc$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2026 13:34:58 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80"; logging-data="8589"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Xref: csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:661475 comp.lang.fortran:126977 comp.lang.c++:125332 alt.comp.lang.rust:427 alt.folklore.computers:236037

In article <11bkfcc$104cc$1@dont-email.me>,  <boltar@caprica.universe> wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Oct 2026 00:28:19 -0000 (UTC)
>cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) gabbled:
>> [snip]
>
>No, it isn't. How similar do you think the posix and windows threading
>model/api are? Yet somehow C++ provides a common wrapper for both. There is
>no reason the same can't be done for processes and your irrelevant waffle
>about past issues of threading on *nix don't change that.

You didn't answer my questions.

What do you think that a "thread" is?
What do you think that a "process" is?

	- Dan C.