Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!post.local From: "John Levine" Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Panasonic call blocker [telecom] Date: 14 Jan 2023 20:16:13 -0000 Organization: The Telecom Digest Sender: news@iecc.com Approved: telecom-moderator@telecom.csail.mit.edu Message-ID: References: <28523EF1-86BA-4122-ACDA-C2119038DE2D@jt-mj.net> Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="87516"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" Authentication-Results: iecc.com; spf=pass spf.mailfrom=moder8@telecomdigest.us spf.helo=telecomdigest.us smtp.remote-ip="71.19.144.55"; dmarc=none header.from=taugh.com polrec.p=none polrec.pct=100 In-Reply-To: <28523EF1-86BA-4122-ACDA-C2119038DE2D@jt-mj.net> Cleverness: some X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Originator: johnl@iecc.com (John Levine) Xref: csiph.com comp.dcom.telecom:13735 According to Julian THOMAS : >(There is a Panasonic Call Bloker) For about $110 - claims to be >preloaded with 14000 robocall/telemarketing numbers. > >Is this worthwhile? No. > Seems to me a lot of the nuisance calls use spoofed numbers. No kidding. My landline, which I think is provided by the same telco as yours, is pretty good at giving SUSPECTED SPAM with the caller ID. -- Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly