Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!not-for-mail From: tls@panix.com (Thor Lancelot Simon) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Need a large PBX. [telecom] Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:41:10 +0000 (UTC) Organization: The Telecom Digest Lines: 20 Sender: news@iecc.com Approved: telecom-moderator@telecom.csail.mit.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: news.iecc.com X-Trace: gal.iecc.com 1304144644 13866 64.57.183.58 (30 Apr 2011 06:24:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@iecc.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 06:24:04 +0000 (UTC) MBOX-Line: From news@panix.com Fri Apr 29 15:41:15 2011 In-Reply-To: Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.dcom.telecom:550 In article , Scott Dorsey wrote: >Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: >>Almost all traffic is local to the PBX. The minimal outside traffic >>is currently handled by 10 ground-start trunks but this particular >>aspect of the system could, of course, be replaced by something more >>modern. Elsewise, I really do want a plain vanilla old fashioned PBX. >> >>Not that anyone seems to want to sell me one of those these days. > >Call your Nortel rep. They will actually talk to you. They're also operating in bankruptcy, are they not? -- Thor Lancelot Simon tls@panix.com And now he couldn't remember when this passion had flown, leaving him so foolish and bewildered and astray: can any man? William Styron