Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Helpful Harry Newsgroups: comp.databases.filemaker Subject: Re: Problem with Linked Record in Layout Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 16:40:19 +1300 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Lines: 35 Message-ID: <120220161640193816%HelpfulHarry@BusyWorking.com> References: <1mig8xl.1ecfd0m1tae6wbN%csampson@inetworld.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: haD+OImfFYRQ16ABS7oirw.user.gioia.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Thoth/1.8.4 (Carbon/OS X) X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Face: vIZzK[X\z-._]-_:U?l@cBtwg<{a>ggn\mH}Vs>38E,#R%7h%U0'=4;1Q=erO %[T#a{YJfGvAbWmE@f_h], Charles H. Sampson wrote: > > In an earlier thread, we established that what I've been doing is not > necessarily bad or wrong. Based on that, here's my problem. > > I have a database containing four related tables. (There are two other > independent tables used for generating reports.) Two of the tables are > related with a simple one-to-many relationship. I have a layout for the > table on the "one" side of this relationship. It has three ordinary > fields and a field into the related table. There is also a portal into a > third table. The field into the related table displays the related data > as a drop-down list. Auto-complete is on. > > This setup has worked well for a few years. Suddenly, I can no longer > enter data into this field when creating a new record. The first three > fields are no problem. I can't eve put the cursor into the fourth field. > > When I look at an existing record, I see that the drop-down list is > showing values from the wrong field of the related table. Still, when I > enter a "proper" value (from the correct field), it works. The value > displayed is the one I entered. However, clicking in that field again > gives me the drop-down list of values from the wrong filed. > > I've had some success with duplicating a existing record and then > editing the copy to have the values I want for the new record. I'm > uncomfortable with that. > > Any ideas? As always, thanks in advance. It sounds like the field's pop-up menu value list definition is wonky. Perhaps it's using the wrong field in the Relationship link or simply using a pre-set value list. Helpful Harry :o)