Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!cs.uu.nl!news.stack.nl!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Willem Newsgroups: comp.compression Subject: Re: At 37bits/sec, A Wide band ( upto 32KHz) Speech Codec Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Eindhoven University of Technology Lines: 47 Message-ID: References: <77448bd3-2dae-4d0f-b0f9-a5dab6cd1a30@d14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <2178b36c-71e6-4cac-baf2-f91cb1a4ace1@dq7g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <60ffb2f7-9d29-4e55-93d1-13a593128e78@k15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: toad.stack.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: mud.stack.nl 1316029192 6474 2001:610:1108:5010::135 (14 Sep 2011 19:39:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@stack.nl NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:39:52 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (FreeBSD) Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compression:564 Earl_Colby_Pottinger wrote: ) On Sep 14, 9:50?am, Nimo wrote: )> 1. When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is )> possible, )> ?he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is )> impossible, he is very probably wrong. )> 2.The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture )> a little way past them into the impossible. )> 3.Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from )> magic. )> )> Clarke's three laws. )> )> ? ?wait few days(yes, not weeks just daysl. ICQ is going to be in )> history ..) ) ) Clarke's Laws are over-ridden by the Idiom of 'Fool me once, shame on ) you; fool me twice, shame on me', lame claims like your's always fail ) - ALWAYS! ) ) Why if you really had something did you not prepare in advance and ) have it ready before announcing it? If you only needed days, why not ) wait those few days be posting. ) ) Like all the lamers before you, you hoped to get people praising you ) over something you never had. I predict that a week from now you will ) have some weak excuse why you can't release a test suite. Lamers ) like you always do that all the time, year after year. ) ) Words are just hot air, working code is KING! Speech compression at 37kbps seems quite plausible, although the number 37 seems a bit arbitrary. I would expect 32 or 40. ADPCM speech compression does 12, 24, 32 or 40kbps, for example. I'd worry more about the 'CD quality' claim, which is rather more subjective. SaSW, Willem -- Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements made in the above text. For all I know I might be drugged or something.. No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you ! #EOT