Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.n-ix.net!news.belwue.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail From: human Newsgroups: comp.compression Subject: Re: removing predictable crap from poor quality jpegs Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 17:25:03 +0200 Organization: humanity Lines: 13 Message-ID: <4DCD4D4F.C4699498@elfavo.com> References: <877ha8xeex.fsf@bazspaz.fatphil.org> <87y62nx1vx.fsf@bazspaz.fatphil.org> <425999b8-260b-44d1-9591-282d22c89566@a10g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <4DC28B80.F82CF30E@elfavo.com> <946afd41-cc84-4339-b13a-1ac83d8a5fc0@s14g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <4DC3E870.7D929774@elfavo.com> <4DC64BB1.77617120@elfavo.com> <4DC6C852.C7ABB529@elfavo.com> <6af5e3ba-bf14-451b-b246-dacd9de84473@o7g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <4DC7AB04.58968C72@elfavo.com> <4DC7DD6D.271AC0F3@elfavo.com> <24b48e2e-fd8d-4120-aa77-38c5aa109d94@d28g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <4DC83138.6D401195@elfavo.com> <4DCBE5D5.14121FE9@elfavo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: port-92-195-78-41.dynamic.qsc.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: online.de 1305300243 32297 92.195.78.41 (13 May 2011 15:24:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 15:24:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [de] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.compression:266 > http://jpegclub.org/temp/ > http://jpegclub.org/temp/ITU-T-JPEG-Plus-Proposal_R3.doc And by the way, on that meeting I personally talked to Ms. Mitchell (etc.), who is editor of the original JPEG standard and "JPEG bible" book author, and I could see that they had no clue about the DCT. That's why half of the JPEG standard is obsolete. See, I know something, that's why I don't need to speculate. You don't know, that's why you speculate. ciao human