Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!xmission!news.snarked.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED!nerds-end From: Hans-Peter Diettrich Newsgroups: comp.compilers Subject: Re: Programming language and IDE design Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 19:48:14 +0100 Organization: Compilers Central Lines: 11 Sender: johnl@iecc.com Approved: comp.compilers@iecc.com Message-ID: <13-11-017@comp.compilers> References: <13-11-016@comp.compilers> NNTP-Posting-Host: news.iecc.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: leila.iecc.com 1384799934 15454 64.57.183.58 (18 Nov 2013 18:38:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@iecc.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 18:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Keywords: C, parse Posted-Date: 18 Nov 2013 13:38:53 EST X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com X-FAQ-and-archives: http://compilers.iecc.com Xref: csiph.com comp.compilers:1041 Martin Ward schrieb: > On Friday 08 Nov 2013 at 21:04, George Neuner wrote: >> The majority of successful languages are LL(k) for small k. It's hard >> to get much simpler than that for parsing. > > C is not LL(K), C is LL(1) with one exception, which makes it LL(2). See my ToPas project on SourceForge. DoDi