Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news.misty.com!news.iecc.com!.POSTED!nerds-end From: "Aaron W. Hsu" Newsgroups: comp.compilers Subject: Re: Static Branch Prediction Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 00:09:49 -0500 Organization: Indiana University Lines: 12 Sender: johnl@iecc.com Approved: comp.compilers@iecc.com Message-ID: <12-12-002@comp.compilers> References: <50b36d04$0$40095$c3e8da3$7c32e45a@news.astraweb.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: news.iecc.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: leila.iecc.com 1354396377 97522 64.57.183.58 (1 Dec 2012 21:12:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@iecc.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 21:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Keywords: analysis Posted-Date: 01 Dec 2012 16:12:57 EST X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com X-FAQ-and-archives: http://compilers.iecc.com Xref: csiph.com comp.compilers:786 Jan-Erik Dahlin wrote: > Can anyone point me to more recent research along the same lines? The only recent research I know about in branch prediction (this is not my area) is in hardware branch predictions, and you can learn more about those by reading about the various chipsets that are out there. -- Aaron W. Hsu | arcfide@sacrideo.us | http://www.sacrideo.us Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking.