Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!not-for-mail From: Grant Edwards Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded Subject: Re: Language feature selection Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <77e6e550-dd0c-4cb8-9bed-09d83b40b823@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1489075896 6140 67.130.15.94 (9 Mar 2017 16:11:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:11:36 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (Linux) Xref: csiph.com comp.arch.embedded:25953 On 2017-03-09, David Brown wrote: > I don't feel there is much wrong with the standard C method of making > constant pointers such as I described. Walter called it a "kludge" - I > specifically use quotation marks because I don't see it as a kludge. > The only problem I see is that it defines the names as macros which > don't obey scope. Agreed. Apart from the scope issue, I don't see any problems with the standard C "kludge". -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Do you have exactly at what I want in a plaid gmail.com poindexter bar bat??