Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!not-for-mail
From: Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded,sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Atmel Bought by Microchip
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:27:32 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <nmldck$ilc$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <nkuv98$duc$1@dont-email.me> <nl1703$9aj$1@dont-email.me> <nmjg5m$9ro$1@panix1.panix.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net
X-Trace: reader1.panix.com 1468938452 19116 67.130.15.94 (19 Jul 2016 14:27:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:27:32 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (Linux)
Xref: csiph.com comp.arch.embedded:24665 sci.electronics.design:419766

On 2016-07-18, Jeff Jonas <jeffj@panix.com> wrote:

> Intel is trying to force themselves into the embedded market with
> the Galileo Arduino-like platform with the Quark Chip, and the
> Edison SoC (system on chip).  But I see nobody really adopting that
> despite familiarity and comfort with the x86 architecture.

Because the more familiar you are with the x86 architecture, the less
comfortable you are with it.

-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! An air of FRENCH FRIES
                                  at               permeates my nostrils!!
                              gmail.com