Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 14:18:48 -0500 From: Randy Yates Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded,comp.dsp Subject: Re: Small, fast, resource-rich processor Organization: Digital Signal Labs References: <7x7gedqun7.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <7xa9j82g4a.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <7xhad4vhoi.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <87k3hw39ec.fsf@digitalsignallabs.com> <87wqlvhjfd.fsf@digitalsignallabs.com> <87txgzfwfs.fsf@digitalsignallabs.com> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 15:18:45 -0400 Message-ID: <87fvsjbhwq.fsf@digitalsignallabs.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:S/axWS5VdyFsnCzRf/qJBi2o/AU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Lines: 36 X-Trace: sv3-eaXaPb7NF58mSxmNxxa8FAH/AQ+9e56qEvcXAH7LwgHjl1JBx7VHxrvTCdg5hoeXNQlsm2EzV+ybO+h!wbzPGnrxlqdyiDLpFvUWZbCZrEYlN+Lt+rSjUna1qcAMUuWfwyBmippwgRSEGLmwV/2mAx75 X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 3037 Xref: csiph.com comp.arch.embedded:14094 comp.dsp:19457 Randy Yates writes: > rickman writes: > >> On 10/2/2013 9:49 AM, Randy Yates wrote: >>> rickman writes: >>> >>>> On 10/1/2013 6:37 PM, Randy Yates wrote: >>>>> rickman writes: >>>>>> [...] >>>>>> I'm just going to make one more point and then I'm done with this >>>>>> topic. Floating point is just fixed point with a range extending >>>>>> multiplier added. Anything you can do with fixed point you can do >>>>>> with floating point. The opposite is *not* true. >>>>> >>>>> Here is something you can do with fixed-point that you can't do >>>>> with floating point: perform a multiply-accumulate with 64 bits >>>>> of precision. >>>> >>>> Really? You can't have a 64 bit mantissa with a floating point >>>> number? Wow, it must be one of those really subtle mathematical >>>> things... >>> >>> I'm sorry - I should have been more explicit on the basis of >>> comparison I am proposing: same number of bits for each. >> >> Ok, then the point is... pointless. > > Really? The amount of resources required to accomplish a task is > pointless? Or was that a joke? Sorry! -- Randy Yates Digital Signal Labs http://www.digitalsignallabs.com