Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net>
Newsgroups: alt.os.linux.debian,alt.os.linux,alt.comp.freeware
Subject: Re: Systemd fun fun fun
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 22:23:41 +0100
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <ef4getFndbkU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <smu0vb12h4lhpc6k5oeplpapu6lbbof74b@4ax.com> <h142vbpdk7v52kh7lvmh7htm5fubi52pi4@net.com> <n8j2vbl158nhdtqgt4pofsl6odpqg12vcl@net.com> <87shscxe1z.fsf_-_@violet.siamics.net> <o6ideq$f49$1@gioia.aioe.org> <o6ipe8$tt7$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net z9VvbOZ3tnqALlIvSasjGAS9qWQbZ6ykJ4Va61+5fkMZAiR2GM
Cancel-Lock: sha1:I9vnwS11z8W6HDV6ZlW+1S28INk=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0
In-Reply-To: <o6ipe8$tt7$1@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com alt.os.linux.debian:8627 alt.os.linux:41693 alt.comp.freeware:275775

On 01/28/17 19:55, William Unruh wrote:
> On 2017-01-28, Innocuous <myemail6622@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On 10/04/2016 12:40 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>>>>>>>> Yrrah <Yrrah-acf@acf.invalid> writes:
>>
>>>   Broken by design: systemd
>>>   http://ewontfix.com/14
>>>
>>> 	I think these provide nice summaries on what to expect of this
>>> 	specific part of the "modern" GNU/Linux system design.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I do not like systemd. I've changed over to using Devuan.
>> The concept of systemd is wrong in my view.
> Not sure the concept is wrong. Fast booting is a good idea. The implimentation has problems.

There are other init systems which supports parallel starting of
services without the faults. systemd do not start everything, some
things it just leaves for later, so you may have a flawed system.

-- 

 //Aho