Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Morten Reistad Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: Apple adds 2008-2009 Macs to list of 'vintage and obsolete' products Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 08:27:42 +0100 Organization: Me, Myself and I Lines: 52 Message-ID: References: Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="13f37dd5708c3bde6d7227ebe71a7235"; logging-data="29460"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18/kwuvmiVcnWi6dVBdzUZq0JBLurOpZoU=" Originator: mrr@sambook.reistad.name (Morten Reistad) X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Cancel-Lock: sha1:RDlrVR+DUNhNp0/1urB4GDLX9XQ= Xref: csiph.com alt.folklore.computers:155608 In article , Dan Espen wrote: >Laurent Delacroix writes: > >> So: >> * when did we stop delivering performance? >... >> * how come no one seems to have realized that we're "running in place", >> we're doing the same exact stuff, just inside a more polished (and less >> functional, IMHO) user interface? And why are most users ready to give >> up perfectly working computers (and phones - well, aint't the two the >> same these days?) just to write our email or spreadsheets in a more >> colorful interface? >> >> End of rant :-) > >So how come, when I read these rants do I feel left out? > >I'm still running the exact same Fvwm interface I designed 20 years ago. >Slightly tuned up, but at the core, still exactly what I want. I caved in and have gnome/ubuntu on a few machines But on my trusty travel laptop I keep running xfce4. >At the same time, Linux has made leaps and bounds. >The most obvious place I see that is in boot times which >systemd has dropped to seconds. Sound works better but mostly >Linux just continues to work. I am down to around 45 seconds for a full cold start, 12 of which are spent in the bios. >I replaced my system disk with a 128G SSD. >That's a really nice improvement getting Firefox startup time >to pretty much instant, and even Libreoffice and Gimp come up >reasonably quick. > >So, no complaints here. > >I'm seeing pretty much the same interface, with improvements in speed >and function. And a _lot_ of improvement on battery life. Yes, I run arm, with the samsung chromebooks and a linux reinstall. 10 hours usable work time on a $200 laptop. > >Oh yeah, my favorite tool Emacs gets better too. The build times stay constand though. 90 seconds for make -j n where n is the number of processors. -- mrr