Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "879" <879@nospam.com> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers Subject: Re: 1970--protesters seize computer center Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:49:35 +1100 Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: <20160105000414@news.eternal-september.org> <20160105134231@news.eternal-september.org> <20160105141914@news.eternal-september.org> <20160105150735@news.eternal-september.org> <20160105162029@news.eternal-september.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 2ykffHKUEV/wLmLUCP0txgs9PpnCklALaZnJYGl5gUWIw0uA8= Cancel-Lock: sha1:HiS67KuGKBZY5lt9h1lgCrIH3rQ= In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 Xref: csiph.com alt.folklore.computers:156188 "J. Clarke" wrote in message news:MPG.30f615299beee3d4989d9d@news.eternal-september.org... > In article <20160105162029@news.eternal-september.org>, > rogblake@iname.invalid says... >> >> On 2016-01-05, Scott Lurndal wrote: >> > No, it is in no way similar. >> >> Of course it is. You simply do not want to see what is right in front >> of you. As I said, virtually any small business has a story behind it >> of an individual who was dissatisfied with his situation rising to >> the occasion to do something about it. I did it myself > > Of course you started flat out busted broke, homeless, without > transporation, without education, without a pot to piss in. No one is without any education and millions of illegals do fine without that other stuff. >> and personally >> know many others who have done so. Yes, it used to be easier in the past, >> but it is still possible to do so and it is still done every day. Some >> even become quite wealthy. > > And yet you cannot explain how to do it or cite any evidence other than > your own opinion to support your argument. > > If you own a business, you have interviewed prospective employees. How > many of those have the wherewithal to do what you claim that you did? Irrelevant to the fact that plenty can and do every single day. >> Apparently you wish to believe that the individual is a victim who has no >> options other than to shiver in the dark and hope that his betters decide >> to tip the statistics in his favor. I don't buy it. > > So you of course go into the inner city and teach people your surefire > method to success. Don't need to, anyone can do that without having to have someone teach them how to do it, most obviously with the drug dealers.