Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Donald Miller Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server,talk.rape,alt.computer.security,microsoft.public.se curity,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Dateline Saturday night Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 02:09:19 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <63d7f4daea3df05b09357546b1b45c93@hoi-polloi.org> <2e21850502671df6b45da329da7ba168@roance.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 02:09:19 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5738afe2f468f3c7686b46213f2ee706"; logging-data="5324"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18xHFathKLCBIZVniRfbOPAVPaTgBDaRYE=" User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) Cancel-Lock: sha1:uWUr5mVvbLr1MapMA7XU55XA7G4= Xref: csiph.com alt.privacy.anon-server:54726 talk.rape:322 alt.computer.security:5809 comp.os.linux.advocacy:381775 On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:11:30 -0700, Snit wrote: > On 11/22/16, 7:50 AM, in article o11luo$283$2@dont-email.me, "Silver > Slimer" > <.m@nsn.s> wrote: > >> On 2016-11-21 9:20 PM, Anonymous wrote: >>> In article <63d7f4daea3df05b09357546b1b45c93@hoi-polloi.org> Anonymous >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On the Saturday night Dateline, the police said that a serial >>>> rapist that they had caught had a computer that they and the FBI >>>> had not been able to crack. They seemed to be talking about the >>>> entire contents on the computer. They didn't say what the >>>> encryption was, but from the looks of the rapist, he probably used >>>> TrueCrypt to whole disk encrypt his computer. >>>> >>>> Another tribute to TrueCrypt's security. >>> >>> How do they know he was a rapist if they couldn't crack his Windows >>> computer security? >>> >>> Maybe they should hire the Republicans who hacked Hillary's mail >>> server and blamed it on the Russians. >> >> Maybe they caught him in the act. If they only have a reasonable >> suspicion but can't get to the contents of the computer which, I >> assume, >> would be child porn, their entire case is screwed. It will have to rely >> on the testimony of kids who may or may not be accurate in their >> depictions and who can easily be manipulated into stating things that >> never actually happened. > > So can you when you read Infowars and Breitbart. :) Both are uber right wing mouthpieces.