Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richmond Newsgroups: alt.comp.software.firefox Subject: Re: Tor Browser User Survey Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:56:02 +0100 Organization: Frantic Message-ID: <86ikn44659.fsf@example.com> References: <20250415.234434.f92ddeb9@yamn.paranoici.org> <9h2uvj1kcibpeldjp0c128codk1u8aiqa1@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="136455"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:KhzttkhXalQkIrN1JhL/zWkL6LU= sha1:iPwOm6DZTI2fuStCXeSBh/YzMkk= X-User-ID: eJwNwgERwDAIA0BLZSUJyGGw+pfQ3T82jS0n6Di/YuLp+gbo8AwsaYY6B42peWkpQjvSVvMCHAMQxQ== Xref: csiph.com alt.comp.software.firefox:13091 "John C." writes: > IMO, using Tor provides a convenient red-flag for TLAs to begin keeping > an eye on a person to see if they're using the browser for illicit > reasons. I am likewise thoroughly convinced that it's transparent to > such agencies and has always been so. In my opinion it is not much different from using a VPN, more convenient perhaps as you don't have to find a provider and configure it. Here in the UK the government requires ISPs to keep a log of URLs visited. There are many legitimate reasons why you might not want a log, for example looking up mental health issues.