Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Frank Slootweg Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-11 Subject: Re: How To Speed Startup Of Microsoft Office? Have It Running All The Time! Date: 30 Mar 2025 14:39:08 GMT Organization: NOYB Lines: 30 Message-ID: References: <6vidujd9u5ruhm8b85o52njfjghgoah65a@4ax.com> X-Trace: individual.net WDebUsl3sqXEFUmDhVKljgu4po5JXnyJoo+3CSBeUV6CadmN1S X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:kXBZYuugP1Tpmj3EiF4FJUx1CIA= sha256:+2ItvSzJiWSOEYKf2F00e9FoOhsmd5MszN4Ag5JX+60= User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:688450 alt.comp.os.windows-11:18079 Borax Man wrote: > ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.advocacy.] > On 2025-03-29, Frank Slootweg wrote: [...] > >> Linux does the right thing here IMO. Store what has been accessed from > >> the filesystem in RAM, but drop it when needed. > > > > Windows - and, as Paul noted, all other OSs - does the exact same > > thing. > > I may be a little out of date. I recall stuff like this back in the mid > 2000's, so maybe I'm misreading how things are working today. > > I do know, from practical experience, having the exact same laptop at > work with Window 10 and with Debian at home, that Windows in general > seems to perform worse. There are other variables at play here, of > course. We can fully agree on that. Lean-and-mean is not one of Windows' virtues. We (should) just use what fits our needs best. I've professionally supported, managed and used Unix/UNIX systems for over two decades and still use Cygwin - a Linux-like environment - under Windows, the best of both worlds for *me*. OS wars are silly, especially if The Other OS (TM) doesn't run the software one needs/wants. (AFAIC.) EOD.