Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Fokke Nauta <fnauta@solfon.nl>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-11
Subject: Re: Can't connect to laptop
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 12:00:07 +0200
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <m7rgh7Frbb7U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <m76dejFfqtkU1@mid.individual.net> <vuq7c6$1gueo$1@dont-email.me> <m7h095F68jtU9@mid.individual.net> <vv081j$33f1u$1@dont-email.me> <m7jjboFiuinU5@mid.individual.net> <m7jst4FkdshU2@mid.individual.net> <vv2inm$1840g$1@dont-email.me> <m7kccmFn1a4U4@mid.individual.net> <vv304n$1jfgf$2@dont-email.me> <m7kgd6FnqcsU1@mid.individual.net> <vv3b4g$1tvrf$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net 2TWB5TCHT63/YStFDxB9fAM2LRrZXxl0uxMWj0jgWqarfsYV1/
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DmDisRLzoCiN3WreKVJHka+jSVI= sha256:iYSRB7lW17PBIqA9A1A2wjO/SPpP4OkzlnGMjopUx34=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Content-Language: nl
In-Reply-To: <vv3b4g$1tvrf$1@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com alt.comp.os.windows-11:19051

On 02/05/2025 22:49, Java Jive wrote:
> On 2025-05-02 19:15, Fokke Nauta wrote:
>> On 02/05/2025 19:41, Java Jive wrote:
>>> On 2025-05-02 18:06, Fokke Nauta wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 02/05/2025 15:52, Java Jive wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2025-05-02 13:42, Fokke Nauta wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 02/05/2025 11:59, Fokke Nauta wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 01/05/2025 18:38, Java Jive wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, on a non-problem PC, select Network in Explorer, in the 
>>>>>>>> right-hand windows pane ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      <rt-click> in a blank area
>>>>>>>>      Group by
>>>>>>>>      More ...
>>>>>>>>      Select 'Discovery Method' and give it a width of, say, 64
>>>>>>>>      Click OK
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does the problem PC show the same discovery method as the other 
>>>>>>>> non-problem PCs?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll check this out as well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think it would be worth repeating this on the problem PC, even 
>>>>>>>> though I'm not sure how interesting the result would be, given 
>>>>>>>> that it can't see much, if anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you get around to trying this?  As other possibilities fall by 
>>>>> the wayside, this one assumes greater importance.
>>>
>>> Still no answer to this?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I did.
>> Didn't make any difference.
> 
> I wasn't expecting it to make a difference, I was hoping it might show 
> useful information which you would then relay on to us.  What method is 
> discovering ...
>      The non-problem PCs;
>      The problem PC?
> 
What do you mean by that?

Fokke