Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Fokke Nauta <fnauta@solfon.nl>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-11
Subject: Re: Can't connect to laptop
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 20:15:02 +0200
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <m7kgd6FnqcsU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <m76dejFfqtkU1@mid.individual.net> <vuq7c6$1gueo$1@dont-email.me> <m7h095F68jtU9@mid.individual.net> <vv081j$33f1u$1@dont-email.me> <m7jjboFiuinU5@mid.individual.net> <m7jst4FkdshU2@mid.individual.net> <vv2inm$1840g$1@dont-email.me> <m7kccmFn1a4U4@mid.individual.net> <vv304n$1jfgf$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net i7iRB4JAJ6wfkxji0t1pWQbDn13gu0asz4Qtmao4KTSLcUt/mi
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1b+B3TxE5MWpi3f/E7q80IwCG0Y= sha256:GDCcLkvBC/y1UpFZ7KYGqhhhmkXB7DXXzmox11GQQ0M=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Content-Language: nl
In-Reply-To: <vv304n$1jfgf$2@dont-email.me>
Xref: csiph.com alt.comp.os.windows-11:18993

On 02/05/2025 19:41, Java Jive wrote:
> On 2025-05-02 18:06, Fokke Nauta wrote:
>>
>> On 02/05/2025 15:52, Java Jive wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2025-05-02 13:42, Fokke Nauta wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 02/05/2025 11:59, Fokke Nauta wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/05/2025 18:38, Java Jive wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, on a non-problem PC, select Network in Explorer, in the 
>>>>>> right-hand windows pane ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      <rt-click> in a blank area
>>>>>>      Group by
>>>>>>      More ...
>>>>>>      Select 'Discovery Method' and give it a width of, say, 64
>>>>>>      Click OK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does the problem PC show the same discovery method as the other 
>>>>>> non-problem PCs?
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll check this out as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it would be worth repeating this on the problem PC, even 
>>>>>> though I'm not sure how interesting the result would be, given 
>>>>>> that it can't see much, if anything.
>>>
>>> Did you get around to trying this?  As other possibilities fall by 
>>> the wayside, this one assumes greater importance.
> 
> Still no answer to this?
> 

Yes, I did.
Didn't make any difference.

Fokke